Re: max_wal_senders must die

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date: 2010-10-28 23:40:12
Message-ID: 1288309212.22359.129.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:25 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > https://www.postgresqlconference.org/content/replication-poll
> >
> > You don't have to login to take it but of course it helps with validity
> > of results.
>
> Oh, I'd already put something up on http://www.postgresql.org/community

Sorry, didn't know... I have 122 responses so far, which I think will be
surprising (some of them certainly surprised me). I will keep it open
until next week and then post the results.

JD

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-10-28 23:45:18 Buildfarm server upgrade
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-10-28 23:25:34 Re: max_wal_senders must die