| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_auth_members.grantor is bunk |
| Date: | 2022-09-21 20:53:52 |
| Message-ID: | 1287111.1663793632@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:26 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> CI is happier with this version, so I've committed 0001. If no major
>> problems emerge, I'll proceed with 0002 as well.
> Done.
Shouldn't the CF entry [1] be closed as committed?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-09-21 21:11:36 | Re: Reducing the WAL overhead of freezing in VACUUM by deduplicating per-tuple freeze plans |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-09-21 20:13:58 | Re: Reducing the WAL overhead of freezing in VACUUM by deduplicating per-tuple freeze plans |