| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lars Nordin <lars(dot)nordin(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG Documentation Improvement |
| Date: | 2010-09-26 14:32:37 |
| Message-ID: | 1285511557.1601.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-interfaces |
On fre, 2010-07-30 at 01:23 +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> I'm thinking about taking a few weeks after August or September
> to review and merge the document intensively (like CommitFest)
> by some developers who are interested in this doc.
>
> I know this change is very huge, and it's very difficult to review
> and give feedback through the whole document. So I think we sould take
> an approach to review and merge chapter by chapter during the period,
> and it can be an effective way to merge this large change
> if we can take time for such intensive work.
>
> Is this possible? Any suggestions?
If you want this reviewed, please send in a patch of the source code you
changed.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-09-26 17:07:32 | Re: Additional index entries and table sorting |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-09-26 11:57:50 | Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2010-09-28 10:01:52 | Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG Documentation Improvement (re-post) |
| Previous Message | Bosco Rama | 2010-08-26 17:28:06 | Re: Large object support in ecpg |