Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: function_name.parameter_name

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: function_name.parameter_name
Date: 2010-09-08 22:34:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Darren Duncan's message of mié sep 08 18:29:35 -0400 2010:

> Personally I like the idea of developers not always having to be forced to 
> choose among two equally good names, and making a wrapper function would be 
> overkill for this feature.

While I don't agree with the idea of providing extra names that are
probably mostly going to increase the confusion of someone trying to
understand such a system, I think this use case would be well covered by
synonyms.  But these would be defined by a new SQL command, say CREATE
SYNONYM, not by funny notation on the initial CREATE FUNCTION call.

Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Darren DuncanDate: 2010-09-08 22:57:03
Subject: Re: function_name.parameter_name
Previous:From: Darren DuncanDate: 2010-09-08 22:29:35
Subject: Re: function_name.parameter_name

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group