Re: review: xml_is_well_formed

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: xml_is_well_formed
Date: 2010-07-31 12:10:33
Message-ID: 1280578233.4895.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2010-07-30 at 12:50 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
> > * xml_is_well_formed returns true for simple text
> >
> > postgres=# SELECT xml_is_well_formed('ssss');
> > xml_is_well_formed
> > --------------------
> > t
> > (1 row)
> >
> > it is probably wrong result - is it ok??
> >
>
> Yes this is OK, pure text is valid XML content.

Are you speaking of XML content fragments that SQL/XML defines?

Well-formedness should probably only allow XML documents.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-07-31 12:42:44 Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2010-07-31 11:08:14 Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype