| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Susanne Ebrecht <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: rename of a view |
| Date: | 2007-06-30 04:26:11 |
| Message-ID: | 12776.1183177571@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> writes:
> I didn't test your patch, but I think we could disallow ALTER TABLE to
> rename sequence and view
There is exactly 0 chance of that happening, because it's always worked
historically.
Personally I don't see a lot of value in this patch at all, but maybe
it is small enough to be justifiable. I am not sure it is complete
however, in the sense of touching everyplace that should be touched,
especially documentation-wise? I mean, its only excuse to live is
that "I expected to find this functionality under $foo", and so I'm
wondering how many values of $foo there are.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2007-06-30 05:33:05 | Re: rename of a view |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2007-06-30 04:15:04 | Re: rename of a view |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2007-06-30 05:33:05 | Re: rename of a view |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2007-06-30 04:15:04 | Re: rename of a view |