primary/secondary/master/slave/standby

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: primary/secondary/master/slave/standby
Date: 2010-05-12 16:33:53
Message-ID: 1273682033.12754.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The server's messages and the documentation uses all of these terms in
mixed ways. Maybe we could decide on some preferred terminology and
adjust the existing texts. Ideas?

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2010-05-12 16:37:15 Re: primary/secondary/master/slave/standby
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-05-12 16:24:22 Re: List traffic