Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 00:21, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:39, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> I wouldn't have a problem with making the Windows port throw an error
>>>> for "local" lines. We'd have to fix initdb to remove that line from the
>>>> sample file (if it doesn't already), but that's surely not hard.
> Here's a patch that I think does what we want. It works fine on
> Windows - I just want to make sure this is what you meant as well?
Looks sane to me.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Christopher Browne||Date: 2011-05-30 18:40:00|
|Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2011-05-30 18:26:00|
|Subject: Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off|