On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:56 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I think we should extend the time available to make sure we have a
> sensible set of features for 9.0. The heat of this discussion tells me
> that we are going to be lacking features that are must-have to someone,
> whether or not they are in the majority.
Missing release dates because of some patch that isn't done is something
the community has been trying to get away from, aggressively. The way
this is supposed to work is:
We have a release date
Features that aren't going to make that date, don't.
Joshua D. Drake
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2010-01-29 16:38:10|
|Subject: Strange heuristic in analyze.c|
|Previous:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2010-01-29 16:28:55|
|Subject: Re: out-of-scope cursor errors|