Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay
Date: 2010-01-18 09:30:29
Message-ID: 1263807029.3642.1689.camel@ebony (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 08:28 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> > Do we need a new record type for that, is there a handy record type to
> > bounce from?
> After starting streaming, slices of WAL are sent as CopyData messages.
> The CopyData payload begins with an XLogRecPtr, followed by the WAL
> data. That payload format needs to be extended with a 'message type'
> field and a new message type for the timestamps need to be added.

It wouldn't be a good use of all of our time for me to work on this. I
have zero unallocated time remaining and you'd still need to review what
I'd written, in any case.

 Simon Riggs 

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-01-18 09:30:36
Subject: Re: Streaming Replication on win32
Previous:From: Leonardo FDate: 2010-01-18 09:13:14
Subject: Re: Review: Patch: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group