On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 13:06 -0700, James William Pye wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > My argument would be now, what is the benefit of the James Pye version
> > over our version. James can you illustrate succinctly why we should be
> > supporting a new version?
> Doing so, succinctly, is unfortunately difficult.
> It is primarily a matter of comparing features, AFAICT. And, furthermore, some features may not be useful to some users.
> It exposes additional functionality that should *not* be incrementally developed in plpython as it would break applications. This was the point of trying to move forward with it for Python 3.
> Function Modules:
> - Does away with the need for GD/SD (more natural Python environment).
> - Allows tracebacks (tracebacks are useful, right?) to implemented easily.
> - Does *not* expose a bastardized variant of the language by pretending that "modules/script files" can return and yield.
> - Helps to promote the Python tenet of being explicit.
> Native Typing:
> - Provides PG type introspection not available in any other PL, AFAIK.
> - Improves efficiency in some cases (conversion must be _explicitly_ called for)
> - MD Array support.
> - Composites are a sequence and a mapping.
> Other features: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/WIP:plpython3
> Aside from function modules and native typing, many of plpython3's features could be implemented incrementally. However, I had a chance to sprint and they are available now in a new implementation. I did so, rather than improving plpython, because I believe that native typing and function modules are very useful.
> I'm not sure this fulfills your request, but, hopefully, it's a start.
It does actually. Now, hackers... as a Python guy I can say these things
are truly useful, to a Python programmer trying to use Python as a
procedural language with PostgreSQL.
What do we think?
Joshua D. Drake
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Chris Browne||Date: 2010-01-13 20:18:22|
|Subject: Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network|
|Previous:||From: James William Pye||Date: 2010-01-13 20:06:58|
|Subject: Re: plpython3|