Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plpython3

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpython3
Date: 2010-01-13 18:08:48
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 19:53 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2010-01-13 at 09:47 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I think it is important to remember that the current version of
> > PL/python is pretty weak compared to its counter parts (Specifically
> > PL/Perl).
> How so?

O.k. you may have just called me on an unintentional bluff. My knowledge
of plpython is dated. I just tested some of the things (like in/out) and
they appear to work at least on 8.4).

My argument would be now, what is the benefit of the James Pye version
over our version. James can you illustrate succinctly why we should be
supporting a new version?

If there is, I am still all for it, but I am a python bigot.


Joshua D. Drake


-- Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-13 18:15:28
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove redundant ownership checks
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-01-13 18:01:51
Subject: Re: Hot standby documentation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group