Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: damage control mode

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-01-10 17:53:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On sön, 2010-01-10 at 01:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now the other approach we could take is that we'll ship *something*
> on 7 Mar, even if it's less stable than what we've traditionally
> considered to be beta quality.  I don't think that really helps
> much though; it just means we need more time in beta.

Maybe we need to ponder for a minute what beta ought to mean for us.
With all the new processes and guidelines being established, the
transition criteria into and out of beta are in my mind pretty weakly

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-01-10 17:55:28
Subject: Re: RADIUS authentication
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-01-10 17:40:54
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group