On mån, 2009-12-28 at 11:08 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > Hans-Juergen Schoenig írta:
> >> just as a background info: this will have some positive side effects
> >> on embedded C programs which should be portable.
> > Not just embedded C programs, every driver that's
> > based on libpq and used PQcmdTuples() will
> > automatically see the benefit.
> And, by the same token, the scope for possibly breaking clients is nearly
> unlimited ...
Why is that? Are there programs out there that expect PQcmdTuples() to
return something that is *not* the tuple count for these commands and
will violently misbehave otherwise?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2009-12-28 16:14:12|
|Subject: Re: updateMinRecoveryPoint bug?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-12-28 16:08:19|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs |