| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SE-PgSQL patch review |
| Date: | 2009-12-01 19:27:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1259695626.26322.55.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 20:28 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> This is totally separate from the really important question of whether
> SE-Linux has a future, and another about whether, if SE-Linux has a
> future, PostgreSQL needs to go there.
Why would we think that it doesn't? Maybe I haven't been following as
much as I should but as I understand it, SE-Linux is pretty much the
defacto policy framework for Linux. Has that changed?
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-01 19:28:11 | Re: enable-thread-safety defaults? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-12-01 19:26:46 | Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4? |