Re: opportunistic tuple freezing

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: opportunistic tuple freezing
Date: 2009-09-17 17:09:27
Message-ID: 1253207367.22589.22.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 12:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Despite my recent screw-up in this department, it should really be the
> patch author's responsibility to test the patch first. Then the
> reviewing process can involve additional testing. So I would say this
> should be moved to Returned With Feedback, and then it can be
> resubmitted later with test results.

Fine with me. I already suspected that this patch wouldn't make it to
the September commitfest:

Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-09-17 17:11:42 Re: community decision-making & 8.5
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-09-17 17:02:35 Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL