Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)
Date: 2001-11-15 16:01:07
Message-ID: 12532.1005840067@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:

/* Plain "long int" fits, use it */
+ #if SIZEOF_INT8 == 0
typedef long int int64;
+ #endif
+ #if SIZEOF_UINT8 == 0
typedef unsigned long int uint64;
+ #endif

This coding appears to assume "if the platform defines int8, then
it will define int64 as well". Seems mighty fragile to me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-15 16:07:58 Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)
Previous Message Roland Roberts 2001-11-15 15:57:53 Re: [PATCHES] Interchange

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-15 16:07:58 Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)
Previous Message Roland Roberts 2001-11-15 15:57:53 Re: [PATCHES] Interchange