On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> (thinks...) Actually, u for unique might be a poor choice if Jeff's
> patch goes in and starts using it for things that aren't exactly
> unique indexes. Should it be just conindid?
My thoughts exactly.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2009-07-28 00:14:23|
|Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints|
|Previous:||From: KaiGai Kohei||Date: 2009-07-27 23:14:01|
|Subject: Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications|