Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)googlemail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Date: 2009-07-24 17:30:42
Message-ID: 1248456642.5201.110.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:25 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> OK, here's an updated patch.

One thing that Alvaro mentioned that you didn't do yet is use the macro
to return from the function (either PG_RETURN_VOID() or

You seem to be following the document here:

So I'm not going to hold you up on this issue. It's passed my review,
and I'm marking it as such on the commitfest page.


Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2009-07-24 17:35:08 Re: When is a record NULL?
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-07-24 17:30:39 Re: When is a record NULL?