Re: [HACKERS] Re: BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file

On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 14:56 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> Simon's idea of keeping a copy of all the history files in the data
> directory wouldn't help here. In fact, I think we already never delete
> history files in the server, it's just that if you omit the pg_xlog
> directory in the base backup they won't be included. But even if they
> are included in the base backup, that wouldn't help in this scenario
> because the base backup still wouldn't contain the history files for the
> later timelines.

You're right there.

That still leaves the problem that we need to know the later history,
even if we don't use it.

> If you delete history file and all the WAL for timeline 6, yeah, nothing
> stops it from being reused. It will work just fine, as if it never
> existed. If you still have the history file and WAL for the old timeline
> 6 lying around somewhere else like an older offsite backup, it's easy
> for the administrator to get confused, but there isn't much we can do
> about that.

ehem, "It will work fine" isn't correct, as Fujii-san observes.

Let's document that timeline files should not be deleted from the
archive iff there exists a base backup made during a lower numbered
timeline.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support