Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS
Date: 2009-04-23 15:14:59
Message-ID: 1240499699.1275.38.camel@localhost (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Zdenek Kotala píše v čt 23. 04. 2009 v 16:50 +0200:
> I hit a problem with that LDFLAGS is not propagated. The same
> problem is with other PL languages as well.
> Is it intention or a bug?

I'm looking on Makefile.shlib and I see there strange line:

# Insert -L from LDFLAGS after any -L already present in SHLIB_LINK
SHLIB_LINK := $(filter -L%, $(SHLIB_LINK)) $(filter -L%, $(LDFLAGS)) $(filter-out -L%, $(SHLIB_LINK))

It seems to me that one of these line are not correct. But anyway I lost -R somewhere.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: tomasDate: 2009-04-23 15:21:43
Subject: Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2009-04-23 15:11:31
Subject: Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group