Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiplejobs", so partly revert

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <adunstan(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiplejobs", so partly revert
Date: 2009-04-14 09:49:08
Message-ID: 1239702548.16396.97.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-committers
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:06 +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert the
> previous patch.

I notice that the release notes talk about "parallel restore", yet the
word parallel is not used in the docs anywhere. The section on restoring
a dump makes no mention of this new facility, nor does the perf tips

Also says that the option doesn't work with --single-transaction, so we
should say that you've added in TRUNCATE to make the COPY go faster (or
haven't you? I know we discussed it). 

 Simon Riggs 
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to


pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-04-14 10:59:17
Subject: pginstaller - pginst: Add new contrib modules in PG 8.4
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-04-14 09:09:12
Subject: pginstaller - pginst: int_aggregate is just an SQL wrapper now.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group