Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TODO item

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO item
Date: 2009-03-28 15:18:20
Message-ID: 1238253500.17035.3.camel@jdavis (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 11:57 +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> The array_agg() does, I believe, match the standard one, at least
> my reading of the spec doesn't reveal any obvious issues there.

I think it's missing the ORDER BY clause. This is not as important for
PostgreSQL because we can do ORDER BY in a subselect, but it's still a
deviation from the standard.

	Jeff Davis

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew GierthDate: 2009-03-28 15:35:01
Subject: Re: TODO item
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-03-28 14:44:03
Subject: Re: TODO item

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group