Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [ Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] SLL error 100% cpu]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Trevor Talbot" <quension(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] SLL error 100% cpu]
Date: 2007-12-12 05:30:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Trevor Talbot" <quension(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 12/11/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I dunno anything about how to fix the real problem (what's winsock error
>> 10004?),

> WSAEINTR, "A blocking operation was interrupted by a call to
> WSACancelBlockingCall."

Oh, then it's exactly the same thing as our bug #2829.

I opined in that thread that OpenSSL was broken because it failed to
treat this as a retryable case like EINTR.  But not being much of a
Windows person, that might be mere hot air.  Someone with a Windows
build environment should try patching OpenSSL to treat WSAEINTR
the same as Unix EINTR and see what happens ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-12-12 07:06:39
Subject: Re: There's random access and then there's random access
Previous:From: Trevor TalbotDate: 2007-12-12 05:13:37
Subject: Re: [ Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] SLL error 100% cpu]

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group