On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 17:50 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 06:15 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > >
> > > Again, I'm not planning to get rid of any existing capabilities
> > Good
> > > unless necessary.
> > That is not a caveat I will accept, a priori.
> What does "accept" mean above? Are you the sole acceptor for this
> feature? That is surprising to me.
> You can say you would vote against it but your wording above seems
> overly controlling.
I would hope my words carry the same weight as others when people speak
of what can and cannot be included, when backed by reasonable and
logical technical reasons.
Some things are important, some not, and I've done my best to use words
that indicate my views on that.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2009-02-26 09:36:19|
|Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery procs|
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2009-02-26 09:22:11|
|Subject: Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-BatchHash
Join for Skewed Data Sets|