Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Edwin Martin <e(dot)j(dot)martin(at)chello(dot)nl>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?
Date: 2001-01-24 15:29:34
Message-ID: 12274.980350174@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs

[Sorry, didn't see the rest of this thread right away]

Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
> I turned the index page into a redirect so that should take care of the
> problem with the exception of pages in the stale docs that are bookmarked.

I'd vote for physically removing the old docs. I'd rather people find
that their bookmark links are broken than that they continue to see
obsolete/incorrect docs ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2001-01-24 15:47:28 Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-24 15:26:29 Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2001-01-24 15:47:28 Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-24 15:26:29 Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?