| From: | Dimi Paun <dimi(at)lattica(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bad performance on simple query |
| Date: | 2008-11-17 17:31:02 |
| Message-ID: | 1226943062.5760.103.camel@dimi.lattica.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 10:16 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Ahhh. Keep in mind that if you just run the query, pgadminIII will
> tell you how long it took to run AND return all the data across the
> network, so it will definitely take longer then. But most of that's
> network io wait so it's not a real issue unless you're saturating your
> network.
But that is brutal -- there's no way it can take 20ms for a request
across an unloaded network.
Moreover, I got something like this:
pgadminIII | pgsql
w/o index: 45ms 0.620ms
w/ index 20ms 0.091ms
How now I try to replicate, and I get 45ms in both cases. This is
very misleading...
--
Dimi Paun <dimi(at)lattica(dot)com>
Lattica, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-11-17 17:40:12 | Re: Bad performance on simple query |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-11-17 17:16:32 | Re: Bad performance on simple query |