Re: Better help output for pgbench -I init_steps

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Tristen Raab <tristen(dot)raab(at)highgo(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>
Subject: Re: Better help output for pgbench -I init_steps
Date: 2023-09-26 21:29:23
Message-ID: 1223a409-8826-0bf1-1cc4-ddb79cefc0e8@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22.09.23 22:01, Tristen Raab wrote:
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world: not tested
> Implements feature: tested, passed
> Spec compliant: not tested
> Documentation: not tested
>
> Hello,
>
> I've reviewed all 4 of your patches, each one applies and builds correctly.
>
>> I think I prefer variant 2. Currently, we only have 8 steps, so it might
>> be overkill to separate them out into a different option.
>
> +1 to this from Peter. Variant 2 is nicely formatted with lots of information which I feel better solves the problem this patch is trying to address.

Committed variant 2. I just changed the initial capitalization of the
sentences to be more consistent with the surrounding text.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2023-09-26 21:42:13 Re: [PATCH] pgrowlocks: Make mode names consistent with docs
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2023-09-26 21:14:26 Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?