|From:||Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>|
|To:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|Subject:||Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 11:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > 2. Also need to decide whether we want pg_class.reltriggers as int2 (as
> > implemented here) or switch to relhastriggers as boolean.
> I'd go for changing the column name/type. Yeah, you will break any
> clients that are still trying to manipulate reltriggers directly, but
> better to break them obviously than non-obviously. And I think a silent
> change in the column semantics has significant risk of the latter.
New version with column type change.
Initdb forced, psql, pg_dump changes also.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
|Next Message||Tom Lane||2008-10-07 19:32:54||Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock|
|Previous Message||Simon Riggs||2008-10-07 18:38:42||Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock|