Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Date: 2008-10-02 22:11:28
Message-ID: 1222985488.4445.1625.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 18:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Version 7
> After reading this for awhile, I realized that there is a rather
> fundamental problem with it: it switches into "consistent recovery"
> mode as soon as it's read WAL beyond ControlFile->minRecoveryPoint.

Just seen this patch has been bounced into November CommitFest, even
though the new patch fixes all of the concerns raised.

I'm concerned that this is going to make the final Hot Standby patch
fairly large, which will make it even harder to review, test and
generally get accepted.

What's the best way to make this easier for you/others to review?

 Simon Riggs 
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Decibel!Date: 2008-10-02 22:23:41
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous:From: Dawid KuroczkoDate: 2008-10-02 21:51:59
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2008-10-02 23:07:55
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-10-02 00:29:35
Subject: Re: still alive?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group