On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 14:29 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > - users could make partial dumps and be confused and lose data.
> > Yes, but they can already do that with -n, -t, and the new
> > and post-data switches. This is one more case where the
> default is
> > a full dump but you one can specificly request less.
> No they actually can't. You are guaranteed that regardless of a -n or
> flag that the data you receive is consistent. You can't guarantee that
> with -w because you could pull different data based on an arbitrary
> conditional that can not apply to all objects.
But are you guaranteed that you have all tables in FK relationships? No.
(But I like that capability also - its useful).
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Gregory Stark||Date: 2008-07-25 22:10:54|
|Subject: Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization|
|Previous:||From: Davy Durham||Date: 2008-07-25 21:46:59|
|Subject: Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump|