> By the way, be carefull. The pg_autovacuum is not good enough for being
> using as the only way for cleaning the database, especially if you have a
> lot of update and delete on the same tables.
For right now, I'm just vacuuming more often to see how things go. I
didn't think I was even generating enough transactions for it to be a
problem, but a 'vacuum full' made a night-and-day difference.
If it continues to be problematic, I'll probably look at an upgrade.
"Oh, the Jedis are going to feel this one!" -- Professor Farnsworth,
In response to
pgsql-admin by date
|Next:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2004-06-17 15:37:36|
|Subject: Re: VARCHAR -vs- CHAR: huge performance difference?|
|Previous:||From: juanmime||Date: 2004-06-17 14:47:46|
|Subject: pg_restore and the missing blobs (oids)|