Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: variadic function support

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: variadic function support
Date: 2008-07-13 06:11:56
Message-ID: 1215929516.11352.60.camel@jdavis (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 07:52 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> you checked second or third variant? There are two variants still.

Sorry for being unclear. Those comments regarded patch v2.2.1. The bug
is in pg_function_is_visible().

Additionally, I'd like to see support for calling variadic functions
with no arguments. I mentioned that in my other email, but it applies to
v2.2.1 as well.

And we should come to a consensus quickly about the declaration style,
e.g. "variadic int[]" or "variadic int".

	Jeff Davis

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2008-07-13 06:12:56
Subject: Re: variadic function support
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2008-07-13 06:06:04
Subject: Re: variadic function support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group