Re: unexpected RULE behavior

On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 12:16 +0200, Mathias Palm wrote:
> CREATE TABLE data (id SERIAL, title VARCHAR);
> CREATE TABLE data_copy(id INT4, title VARCHAR);
> CREATE RULE make_copy AS ON INSERT TO data DO INSERT INTO data_copy
> (id,title) VALUES (NEW.id, NEW.title);
> INSERT INTO data (title) VALUES ('test');
>
> database=# SELECT * FROM data;
> id | title
> ----+-------
> 1 | test
> (1 Zeile)
>
> database=# SELECT * FROM data_copy;
> id | title
> ----+-------
> 2 | test
> (1 Zeile)
>

This is a feature, not a bug. To get the kind of behavior you want, you
need to either use a trigger, or have the rule call a function that
inserts the same values into both tables.

SERIAL implicitly calls nextval() on a sequence to get the default value
to insert. The rule rewrites the query into two queries, and each query
calls nextval(), and each call of nextval() returns a different value.

One way to think about it is that a rule doesn't save any values away in
variables. Functions do save the arguments as variables on the stack,
and those variables can be used multiple times, so that's why calling a
function works.

Regards,
Jeff Davis