| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2008-05-29 21:54:36 |
| Message-ID: | 1212098076.27385.73.camel@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 17:42 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> I would have thought the read only piece would have been more important than
> the synchronous piece. In my experience readable slaves is the big selling
> point in both Oracle and MySQL's implementations, and people are not nearly
> as concerned if there is a small asynchronous window.
The read only piece is the more important piece from a market
perspective.
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2008-05-29 22:06:39 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-29 21:52:37 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2008-05-29 22:00:25 | Re: replication hooks |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-29 21:52:37 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |