Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: temporal extension "period" data type

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: temporal extension "period" data type
Date: 2008-05-26 17:23:15
Message-ID: 1211822595.26526.144.camel@jdavis (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 08:49 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2008, Jeff Davis wrote:
> > And including in core has the usual drawbacks, like waiting for a new 
> > PostgreSQL release just to get some improvement for the data type.
> How stable has the core code implementation been recently?  If major 
> changes to it are unlikely anyway because it's matured, this downside is a 
> lot less important.

Aside from name changes, the code has been fairly static. However, I
expect that others will have suggestions about improving the picksplit
algorithm, selectivity functions, etc.

	Jeff Davis

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-05-26 17:25:47
Subject: Re: Read Uncommitted
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-05-26 17:20:23
Subject: Re: ERRORDATA_STACK_SIZE panic crashes on Windows

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group