|From:||Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|Subject:||[Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump additional options for performance]|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Re-sending post as discussed with Bruce...
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 12:45 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Added to TODO:
> > o Allow pre/data/post files when dumping a single object, for
> > performance reasons
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00205.php
> "When dumping a single object"?? Do you mean database?
It would be for whatever set of objects are specified through the use of
databases, table include/exclude switches.
I've written a patch that implements these new switches on the commands
I have not implemented --schema-pre-file=xxx style because they don't
make any sense when using pg_restore in direct database connection mode.
On reflection I don't see any particular need to produce multiple files
as output, which just complicates an already horrendous user interface.
This is a minimal set of changes and includes nothing at all about
directories, parallelisation in the code etc..
This has the following use cases amongst others...
* dump everything to a file, then use pg_restore first --schema-pre-load
and then --data-only directly into the database, then pg_restore
--schema-post-load to a file so we can edit that file into multiple
pieces to allow index creation in parallel
* dump of database into multiple files by manually specifying which
tables go where, then reload in parallel using multiple psql sessions
The patch tests OK after some testing, though without a test suite that
probably isn't more than a few percentage points of all the possible
code paths. There are no docs for it, as yet.
Further thinking on this....
Some further refinement might replace --data-only and --schema-only with
--want-schema (same as --want-schema-pre --want-schema-post)
These could be used together e.g. --want-schema-pre --want-data
whereas the existing --data-only type switches cannot.
Which would be a straightforward and useful change to the enclosed
That way of doing things is hierarchically extensible to include further
subdivisions of the set of SQL commands produced, e.g. divide
--want-post-schema into objects required to support various inter-table
dependencies and those that don't such as additional indexes. I don't
personally think we need that though.
|Next Message||Magnus Hagander||2008-05-07 14:47:36||Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists|
|Previous Message||Bruce Momjian||2008-05-07 14:28:39||Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists|