On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 15:34 +0000, tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de wrote:
> I would really prefer a more loosely coupled system.
The functionality will be much the same. The implementation would be
more difficult and obscure and there would be more points of failure and
more things to configure, but it wouldn't remove much risk, I think.
Anyway, this feature is already in Postgres when it's built for MacOS X.
So this decision seems to have been made already, at least for that
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-04-01 21:37:43|
|Subject: Re: Access to Row ID information in Functions |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-04-01 21:01:38|
|Subject: Re: Scroll cursor oddity... |
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Brendan Jurd||Date: 2008-04-01 21:39:00|
|Subject: Re: Consistent \d commands in psql|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-04-01 21:07:29|
|Subject: Re: Consistent \d commands in psql |