From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning |
Date: | 2008-03-28 18:58:14 |
Message-ID: | 1206730694.4285.1771.camel@ebony.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:33 -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> bruce(at)momjian(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Added to TODO:
> >
> > * Allow one transaction to see tuples using the snapshot of another
> > transaction
> >
> > This would assist multiple backends in working together.
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00400.php
>
> FYI, code for this is presently available on pgFoundry, at:
> <http://pgfoundry.org/projects/snapclone/>.
>
> I have some benchmarking scripts to commit to it, once I get added to
> the project. (Simon? :-))
>
> FYI, preliminary testing, on a machine hooked up to an EMC CX700 disk
> array is showing that, if I do concurrent dumps of 4 tables, it gives
> a bit better than a 2x speedup over dumping the four tables serially,
> so there's definitely some fruit here.
Oh, very cool. Thanks for testing.
I'll add you now - must have missed that, sorry.
My view is that the TODO item is still needed because we want to work
this into the backend more fully.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-03-28 19:09:59 | Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2008-03-28 18:48:47 | Re: Commitfest patches |