Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Backup

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>
Cc: Phillip Smith <phillip(dot)smith(at)weatherbeeta(dot)com(dot)au>, "'Dominic Carlucci'" <carlucci(at)cae(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, carlucci(at)cae(dot)ca
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Backup
Date: 2008-01-31 13:28:48
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-general
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 07:21 -0500, Chander Ganesan wrote:
> If you don't mind if you lose some transactions

That sentence has no place in any discussion about "backup" because the
risk is not just a few transactions, it is a corrupt and inconsistent
database from which both old and new data would be inaccessible.

As far as I am concerned, if any Postgres user loses data then we're all

  Simon Riggs

In response to


pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2008-01-31 14:34:05
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Backup
Previous:From: Chander GanesanDate: 2008-01-31 12:21:37
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Backup

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Enrico SirolaDate: 2008-01-31 13:49:44
Subject: Re: Oracle Analytical Functions
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-01-31 13:27:27
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL on a CompactFlash

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group