Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior
Date: 2008-01-11 08:26:31
Message-ID: 1200039991.4266.892.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:08 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I'll respin my patch this way...
>
> Third time's the charm?

If we do a shutdown immediate on the postmaster *after* the bgwriter has
written a shutdown checkpoint, do we have any record that there was a
panic stop? Do we enter recovery in that case? I think the answers are
yes and no, but just checking.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-11 14:54:38 Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-11 03:48:17 Re: BUG #3860: xpath crashes backend when is querying xmlagg result