> >> Remove archdir from pg_control; it ought to be a GUC
> >> parameter, not a special case (not that it's implemented
> yet anyway).
> > Is archdir really a GUC parameter ?
> Why shouldn't it be? I see nothing wrong with changing it on-the-fly.
Yes, I think this is a good change, like all others except XID assignment :-)
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-03-06 16:17:56|
|Subject: Re: AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure |
|Previous:||From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB||Date: 2001-03-06 16:05:22|
|Subject: AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure |