AW: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources
Date: 2000-10-31 07:51:59
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633680D8@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > Hmm. I wonder why cc and gcc are doing different math. Wierd.
>
> Not only that, but you get different results with the same compiler
> depending on different optimization settings. The joys of
> binary floating point...

Same on AIX.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-10-31 09:46:39 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Previous Message Luis Magaa 2000-10-31 06:32:37 Data definition for aclitem Datatype