Re: Infinities in type numeric

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Infinities in type numeric
Date: 2020-07-21 22:18:26
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I had a look at this, and I think it's mostly in good shape. It looks
>> like everything from the first message in this thread has been
>> resolved, except I don't know about the jsonpath stuff, because I
>> haven't been following that.

> Thanks for the careful review!

Here's a v4 that syncs numeric in_range() with the new behavior of
float in_range(), and addresses your other comments too.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
numeric-infinities-4.patch text/x-diff 124.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-07-21 22:25:00 Re: v13 planner ERROR: could not determine which collation to use for string comparison
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-07-21 21:52:21 Re: Using Valgrind to detect faulty buffer accesses (no pin or buffer content lock held)