On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 10:47 +0100, Adriaan van Os wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 12:31 +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> >> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:32:17PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >>> ALTER SEQUENCE blah INCREMENT BY val;
> >> this has the sideeffect that all concurrent nextvals() will also
> >> increment by val, which is not always acceptable.
> > So this is a feature proposal, not a bug?
> > Sounds interesting but needs to be on pgsql-hackers, please.
> I posted a message to pgsql-hackers three times but it gets stalled (and the owner of the list
> doesn't reply).
Somebody will need to join pgsql-hackers. Other mail will be reflected
because of spam.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Michael Akinde||Date: 2007-12-14 10:59:51|
|Subject: Re: VACUUM ANALYZE out of memory|
|Previous:||From: Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD||Date: 2007-12-14 09:51:35|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Slow PITR restore|
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2007-12-14 11:20:51|
|Subject: Re: BUG #3811: Getting multiple values from a sequencegenerator|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-12-13 00:34:05|
|Subject: Re: BUG #3774: create table like including index
doesn't update pg_constraints with primary key|