From: | "Darren Reed" <darrenr+postgres(at)fastmail(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is my database now too big? |
Date: | 2007-10-07 08:00:07 |
Message-ID: | 1191744007.14918.1214548241@webmail.messagingengine.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:05:23 -0700, "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> said:
> Darren Reed wrote:
> > I'm starting to wonder if my database has finally grown too big for my
> > computer.
> >
> > But, rather than peform badly, I see a number of "bad things" happen:
> >
> > * pg_dump fails to run, causing an "out of memory" error (I don't
> > understand
> > why this happens, but it does);
> >
> > * restarting postgres across a reboot results in tables disappearing
> > without any error messages being given out (this is *really
> > disturbing*.)
>
> Are you vacuuming?
No. I'm just using the standard config
If you're implying I should?
The problems I've come across have become evident with as little work as
this:
- run "initdb"
- start postgres
- run "psql" to import the dumped data
- run for a short period of time (less than an hour)
- shutdown postgres
- reboot
- postgres starts
- the large tables are now missing
With the above, I wouldn't have thought there is enough time to do
vacuums,
which seem to take quite a while on large tables. The activity is a
mixture
of inserts and updates (from triggers and plsql functions.)
Darren
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-10-07 08:14:10 | Re: Is my database now too big? |
Previous Message | Suresh Gupta VG | 2007-10-07 07:10:26 | Re: Postgresql takes more time to update |