Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: HOT latest patch - version 8

From: <korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: HOT latest patch - version 8
Date: 2007-07-16 20:24:33
Message-ID: 1184617473.19200.109.camel@sakai.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
> I'm looking for ways to make the patch simpler and less invasive. 

Any objections to changing the name of "RedirectDead"?  A RedirectDead
ItemId is not really redirected, it's just a stub representing a dead
tuple (the space for that tuple has been reused but an index entry may
still point to the ItemId).  

How about "stub" or "tombstone"?

                -- Korry

  Korry Douglas    korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: ITAGAKI TakahiroDate: 2007-07-17 02:22:39
Subject: docfix - DELETE doesn't affect auto-analyze
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-07-16 17:38:30
Subject: Re: bogus unixware compiler warnings

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group