| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brett Okken <brett(dot)okken(dot)os(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: char 0x00 |
| Date: | 2020-03-26 14:22:06 |
| Message-ID: | 11841.1585232526@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Brett Okken <brett(dot)okken(dot)os(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It might also be helpful to state in the opening paragraph about character
> set support that the NUL character is not supported in any character set
> (except SQL_ASCII).
Uh, it's not supported *anywhere*, period. If you managed to get the
server to accept a text string with an embedded NUL, I'd like to know
how exactly, because that's a missed validation.
As far as documentation goes, I'd be inclined to address the point
in the page about string data types,
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-character.html
with text along the lines of "The contents of a string value must be
validly encoded according to the database's encoding, and cannot include
the character with code zero". I'd sort of thought we said that there
already, but I don't see it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brett Okken | 2020-03-26 14:28:54 | Re: char 0x00 |
| Previous Message | Brett Okken | 2020-03-26 11:34:24 | char 0x00 |