On Wed, 2007-27-06 at 00:16 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> +1 as well but I'm wondering whether the output is too wide.
Well, the output of \df+ is already likely to be wider than 72
characters, so I'm not sure the patch would really make the situation
materially worse ("\df+ nextval" is 118 characters wide without the
patch, for example). You could also argue that if the user specifies
"+", presumably they are less worried about a concise output format.
> Is it possible to find some shorter string to convey the same meaning?
Nothing obvious comes to mind, but I'm not opposed in principle. Any
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Pavan Deolasee||Date: 2007-06-27 09:06:06|
|Subject: HOT latest patch - version 8|
|Previous:||From: ITAGAKI Takahiro||Date: 2007-06-27 07:22:22|
|Subject: Re: Cancel autovacuum conflicting with DROP TABLE|