Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: psql: add volatility to \df+

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql: add volatility to \df+
Date: 2007-06-27 07:23:11
Message-ID: 1182928991.8960.6.camel@goldbach (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Wed, 2007-27-06 at 00:16 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> +1 as well but I'm wondering whether the output is too wide.

Well, the output of \df+ is already likely to be wider than 72
characters, so I'm not sure the patch would really make the situation
materially worse ("\df+ nextval" is 118 characters wide without the
patch, for example). You could also argue that if the user specifies
"+", presumably they are less worried about a concise output format.

> Is it possible to find some shorter string to convey the same meaning?

Nothing obvious comes to mind, but I'm not opposed in principle. Any


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Pavan DeolaseeDate: 2007-06-27 09:06:06
Subject: HOT latest patch - version 8
Previous:From: ITAGAKI TakahiroDate: 2007-06-27 07:22:22
Subject: Re: Cancel autovacuum conflicting with DROP TABLE

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group