Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: row-level stats and last analyze time

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: row-level stats and last analyze time
Date: 2007-05-03 18:20:19
Message-ID: 1178216419.18303.12.camel@goldbach (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2007-26-04 at 18:07 -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> (1) I believe the reasoning for Tom's earlier change was not to reduce
> the I/O between the backend and the pgstat process [...]

Tom, any comments on this? Your change introduced an undocumented
regression into 8.2. I think you're on the hook for a documentation
update at the very least, if not a revert.


In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2007-05-06 15:12:22
Subject: Re: Documentation of pg_badkend_pid and stats functions
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-05-03 15:19:58
Subject: Re: patch for doubled words

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2007-05-03 18:27:51
Subject: Re: Sequential scans
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2007-05-03 18:20:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze progress report

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group